<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cybersquatting Cases &#187; declaratory judgment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybersquattingcases.com/tag/declaratory-judgment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybersquattingcases.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:58:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Domain Name Owner Wins His Expenses In Cybersquatting Case</title>
		<link>http://cybersquattingcases.com/domain-name-owner-wins-his-expenses-in-cybersquatting-case/2009/10/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://cybersquattingcases.com/domain-name-owner-wins-his-expenses-in-cybersquatting-case/2009/10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>traverselegal.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersquatting Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anticybersquatting consumer protection act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersquatting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[declaratory judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[default judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wipo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybersquattingcases.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A domain name owner recently won his expenses in a cybersquatting case in federal court.  Domain Name Wire reports that Neon Network has been awarded its expenses after it won a default judgment in a declaratory judgment action under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in Arizona.  Aspis Liv Forsakrings, an insurance company, originally filed a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A domain name owner recently won his expenses in a <a href="http://tcattorney.typepad.com/domainnamedispute/">cybersquatting case</a> in federal court.  <a href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/07/domain-owner-wins-expenses-in-lawsuit/">Domain Name Wire</a> reports that Neon Network has been awarded its expenses after it won a default judgment in a declaratory judgment action under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in Arizona.  Aspis Liv Forsakrings, an insurance company, originally filed a cybersquatting case under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy against Neon Network with the World Intellectual Property Organization.  WIPO found that Neon had <a href="http://tcattorney.typepad.com/domainnamedispute/2007/07/domain-name-nig.html">registered the domain name in bad faith</a>, and the aspis.com domain name was transferred to Aspis.</p>
<p>Neon Network then filed a declaratory judgment action in Arizona asking the court to determine that it had not violated the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.  The judge issued a default judgment against Aspis and awarded Neon $1,547.  The judgment can be viewed <a href="http://domainnamewire.com/wp-content/aspis-judgment.pdf">here</a>, courtesy of <a href="http://www.domainnamewire.com">Domain Name Wire</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cybersquattingcases.com/domain-name-owner-wins-his-expenses-in-cybersquatting-case/2009/10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
